When two important requirements appear to work against each other, the default move is almost always a compromise that serves both only halfway. The Contradiction Resolver takes a different approach: it first questions the assumption that creates the contradiction in the first place, then systematically checks whether a separation in time, a split across different levels, or a fundamentally different system can satisfy both requirements at once.
\nThe skill is built for product owners, strategists and executives who are stuck in either/or thinking, for example between a fast result and a lasting effect, between standardization and customization, or between cost discipline and quality standards. The outcome is not a soft middle ground but a synthesis with a clearly named mechanism that explains why both sides are satisfied.
\nThe honest limit: not every contradiction resolves into a genuine both/and solution. Some requirements are, in practice, truly mutually exclusive, for example due to physical, legal or budgetary constraints. The skill provides a structured thinking framework and plausible solution paths, not a guarantee that a contradiction-free solution exists. The proposed synthesis should be checked for real-world feasibility before implementation.
\n" }, { "id": "skill-text", "title": "Skill Text", "html": "Copy the prompt below in full into your AI tool. As a file: widerspruchs-schema.en.json
\n" } ], "schritte": [ { "nr": 1, "titel": "Describe the contradiction", "beschreibung": "Requirement A, requirement B and the reason for the apparent contradiction are named.", "rolle": "mensch" }, { "nr": 2, "titel": "Analyze the paradox", "beschreibung": "Both requirements are captured, the standard compromise is identified and the underlying premise is questioned.", "rolle": "automatisch" }, { "nr": 3, "titel": "Check solution paths", "beschreibung": "Sequence solutions with temporal separation and level solutions with parallel fulfillment are checked systematically.", "rolle": "automatisch" }, { "nr": 4, "titel": "Develop the synthesis", "beschreibung": "A system redesign with a clearly named core mechanism that resolves the contradiction is designed.", "rolle": "automatisch" }, { "nr": 5, "titel": "Result", "beschreibung": "A synthesis is ready that fully satisfies both requirements, without compromise.", "rolle": "ergebnis" } ], "herausgeber": "Voyage Digital", "version": "2.0", "stand": "2026-07-26", "umsetzung": [ { "titel": "Choose a concrete case", "text": "A current decision where two requirements are currently being weighed against each other works best, for example in an ongoing project or ahead of an upcoming strategic choice." }, { "titel": "Set up the skill", "text": "The skill text is copied and filled in with requirement A, requirement B and the assumed reason for exclusion." }, { "titel": "Question the premise openly", "text": "The proposed premise is discussed with the team before the solution paths are evaluated." }, { "titel": "Check the synthesis for feasibility", "text": "The proposed synthesis is checked with those involved for real-world feasibility before implementation, especially where legal, budgetary or physical limits apply." } ], "zutaten": [ "Requirement A", "Requirement B", "Reason for exclusion" ], "beispielSzenario": "A consulting team faces a classic conflict of objectives: the client wants to see fast, visible AI results and, at the same time, a lasting, strategic transformation, two requirements with an apparently opposite time horizon. The Contradiction Resolver questions the premise that fast and lasting exclude each other, and finds a synthesis: a quick-win program that delivers results from day one and is, at the same time, designed as a building block of the long-term strategy.", "eingaben": [ { "feld": "Requirement A", "pflicht": true }, { "feld": "Requirement B, which appears to contradict A", "pflicht": true }, { "feld": "Why the two seem to be mutually exclusive", "pflicht": true }, { "feld": "The standard compromise you want to avoid", "pflicht": false } ], "ausgabe": "The questioned premise that creates the contradiction in the first place, checked sequence solutions with temporal separation, checked level solutions with parallel fulfillment at different levels, a proposal for a system redesign, and a synthesis with a clearly named core mechanism.", "prompt": "# DESCRIPTION\nYou find a solution for two seemingly contradictory requirements that satisfies both completely, without compromise. You question the premise that creates the contradiction in the first place, and systematically check alternative solution paths. Address the user in a professional manner throughout.\n\n# INPUT\n- Requirement A (required)\n- Requirement B, which appears to contradict A (required)\n- Why the two seem to be mutually exclusive (required)\n- The standard compromise you want to AVOID (optional)\n\n# OUTPUT\n- Questioned premise: which assumption turns the contradiction into a contradiction in the first place\n- Sequence solutions: temporal separation, where both requirements are satisfied one after another\n- Level solutions: parallel fulfillment at different levels\n- System redesign: a fundamentally different design that satisfies both naturally\n- Synthesis: the solution with a clearly named core mechanism\n\n# CONTEXT\n- Global placeholders: COMPANY, INDUSTRY, TARGET AUDIENCE\n- Domain knowledge: TRIZ (contradiction resolution), dialectics, design thinking, systems theory\n- Constraint: no compromise. Both requirements must be satisfied completely, no requirement may be quietly watered down\n- Limit: where facts are missing or assumptions are needed, mark them explicitly as an assumption. Not every contradiction can be resolved, some requirements are, in practice, genuinely mutually exclusive. State this openly if no solid synthesis is apparent\n\n# WORKING INSTRUCTIONS\n## Step 1: Understand the paradox\nCapture both requirements and the apparent contradiction in full. Identify the standard compromise that would normally be chosen.\n\n## Step 2: Question the premises\nClarify which assumption turns the contradiction into a contradiction in the first place. What would have to change for both requirements to become compatible?\n\n## Step 3: Check sequence solutions\nCheck whether an order or sequence makes both requirements possible. Can temporal separation resolve the contradiction?\n\n## Step 4: Check level solutions\nCheck whether both requirements can be satisfied simultaneously at different levels. What works in parallel instead of either/or?\n\n## Step 5: System redesign and synthesis\nDesign which new system would naturally satisfy both requirements. Name the core mechanism that resolves the contradiction.\n\n# DEFINITION OF DONE\n[ ] Both requirements are satisfied completely, or it is stated openly that no contradiction-free solution was found\n[ ] The underlying premise has been identified\n[ ] At least two solution approaches have been checked (sequence, level or system redesign)\n[ ] The synthesis has a clear core mechanism\n[ ] The result is not a compromise but a genuine both/and solution\n[ ] Assumptions are explicitly marked as assumptions\n\n# CONVERSATION START\nHello. Tell me two requirements that appear to contradict each other, and I will look for a solution that satisfies both completely. No compromise, no either/or. Describe to me:\n1. Requirement A\n2. Requirement B\n3. Why you think the two are mutually exclusive", "einrichtung": { "intro": "Step-by-step guides for ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot Studio and Langdock.", "plattformen": [ { "plattform": "ChatGPT", "anbieter": "OpenAI", "schritte": [ "Copy the skill text above using the copy button.", "Click your profile picture and select \"Skills\".", "Click \"Create skill\" and paste the copied text as the instruction.", "Adjust inputs, outputs and format where your case requires it.", "Save the skill. It is available in all chats from that point on." ], "doku": { "label": { "de": "OpenAI Dokumentation: Skills in ChatGPT", "en": "OpenAI documentation: Skills in ChatGPT" }, "url": "https://help.openai.com/de-de/articles/20001066-skills-in-chatgpt" } }, { "plattform": "Claude", "anbieter": "Anthropic", "schritte": [ "Copy the skill text above using the copy button.", "Open claude.ai and go to \"Skills\" in your profile.", "Create a new skill and paste the copied text as the instruction.", "The skill works in claude.ai, in Claude Code and through the API.", "Available on the Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise plans." ], "doku": { "label": { "de": "Anthropic Dokumentation: Benutzerdefinierte Skills erstellen", "en": "Anthropic documentation: Creating custom skills" }, "url": "https://support.claude.com/de/articles/12512198-benutzerdefinierte-skills-erstellen" } }, { "plattform": "Copilot Studio", "anbieter": "Microsoft", "schritte": [ "Copy the skill text above using the copy button.", "Open Copilot Studio and create a new agent.", "Paste the copied text as the instruction.", "Connect knowledge sources and tools where needed.", "Publish the agent for yourself or for your organisation." ], "doku": { "label": { "de": "Microsoft Dokumentation: Einen Agent erstellen und bereitstellen", "en": "Microsoft documentation: Create and deploy an agent" }, "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/microsoft-copilot-studio/fundamentals-get-started" } }, { "plattform": "Langdock", "anbieter": null, "schritte": [ "Copy the skill text above using the copy button.", "Open the sidebar and click \"Add skill\".", "Paste the copied text directly as the instruction.", "Connect the skill to integrations such as Gmail or Slack where needed.", "Save the skill and release it for yourself or your team." ], "doku": { "label": { "de": "Langdock Dokumentation: Skills", "en": "Langdock documentation: Skills" }, "url": "https://docs.langdock.com/de/product/chat/skills" } } ] }, "itemIcon": "split", "recommended": [ { "slug": "chancenraum-konzept", "category": "skill", "name": "The Opportunity Space Concept", "teaser": "Turns a seemingly disadvantageous situation into its own opportunity space, working out what becomes possible precisely because of it instead of searching for the obvious problem solution.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "map" }, { "slug": "fundament-geruest", "category": "skill", "name": "The First Principles Framework", "teaser": "The First Principles Framework strips an existing solution or industry practice down to its fundamental truths and rebuilds it from zero, free of convention.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "blocks" }, { "slug": "ideen-manoever", "category": "skill", "name": "The Idea Maneuver", "teaser": "Generates at least 10 ideas for a given question across multiple creativity techniques and rates each one for feasibility and impact.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "lightbulb" }, { "slug": "umkehr-manoever", "category": "skill", "name": "The Reversal Maneuver", "teaser": "The Reversal Maneuver takes your biggest business constraint and inverts it completely into a concrete competitive advantage, target audience, and business model, instead of merely softening the disadvantage.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "undo-2" }, { "slug": "zeitachsen-manoever", "category": "skill", "name": "The Timeline Maneuver", "teaser": "Places the same problem on a timeline and questions it three times, in the past, present and future, to reveal patterns, blind spots and courses of action.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "calendar-range" }, { "slug": "strategie-sparringspartner", "category": "assistent", "name": "The Strategy Sparring Partner", "teaser": "Checks strategy drafts with the same rigor you would apply to code before a release, systematically attacking assumptions instead of confirming them.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "milestone" }, { "slug": "annahmen-protokoll", "category": "skill", "name": "The Assumption Protocol", "teaser": "The Assumption Protocol exposes a belief layer by layer, from its surface justification down to the root assumption beneath it, and shows honestly which layers actually hold up.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "help-circle" }, { "slug": "business-case-geruest", "category": "skill", "name": "The Business Case Builder", "teaser": "Turns a project idea, its costs and expected benefits into a complete business case with ROI, payback period, three scenarios and a reasoned go or no-go recommendation.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "trending-up" }, { "slug": "domino-raster", "category": "skill", "name": "The Domino Grid", "teaser": "The Domino Grid traces a planned action across five levels of consequences to reveal where the real strategic opportunity actually lies.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "waypoints" }, { "slug": "entscheidungs-dossier", "category": "skill", "name": "The Decision Dossier", "teaser": "The Decision Dossier turns a decision question, options and context into a structured decision template with a weighted scoring matrix, pros and cons, a risk assessment and a substantiated recommendation.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "scale" }, { "slug": "gegenrede-protokoll", "category": "skill", "name": "The Devil's Advocate Protocol", "teaser": "The Devil's Advocate Protocol deliberately argues against your strategy or decision to expose risks, questionable assumptions and blind spots before you commit resources.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "messages-square" }, { "slug": "muster-dossier", "category": "skill", "name": "The Pattern Dossier", "teaser": "Collects a series of decisions, projects, or content and exposes the overarching pattern behind them, including the actual unconscious strategy, real selection criteria, and blind spots.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "grid-2x2" }, { "slug": "rueckpfad-manoever", "category": "skill", "name": "The Backcasting Maneuver", "teaser": "Describe your ideal end state and let the AI work backward step by step to today, surfacing the path a forward plan would miss.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "corner-up-left" }, { "slug": "steelman-schema", "category": "skill", "name": "The Steelman Framework", "teaser": "The Steelman Framework takes the deliberate counterposition to an idea, strategy or decision, first summarizing it in its strongest form and then testing it with substantial counterarguments from multiple perspectives, exposed blind spots and worst case scenarios, before closing with a strengthened argument and a clear recommendation.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "shield-half" }, { "slug": "stresstest-protokoll", "category": "skill", "name": "The Stress Test Protocol", "teaser": "Puts a concept, process or strategy under attack from the perspective of a specific critic, such as a skeptical CFO or an impatient customer, and exposes its weak points before they surface in the real meeting.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "activity" }, { "slug": "business-case-dokumentierer", "category": "assistent", "name": "The Business Case Documenter", "teaser": "Turns a project idea, an investment or an initiative into the form decision makers actually read: benefits, costs, risks and a clear recommendation, cleanly structured and free of jargon.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "trending-up" }, { "slug": "gegenargument-sparringspartner", "category": "assistent", "name": "The Counterargument Sparring Partner", "teaser": "Tests a thesis or decision by formulating well-founded counterarguments and systematically questioning assumptions, evidence and logic.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "shield-half" }, { "slug": "wettbewerbskraefte-pruefer", "category": "assistent", "name": "The Five Forces Analyzer", "teaser": "Analyzes an industry systematically using Michael Porter's five competitive forces and derives a well founded assessment of market attractiveness.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung", "itemIcon": "swords" }, { "slug": "grill-me", "category": "tool", "name": "grill-me", "teaser": "grill-me is an external skill repository by Matt Pocock that clarifies plans and designs through persistent questioning, branch by branch, before any code is written.", "domaene": "Strategie & Entscheidung" }, { "slug": "wettbewerbs-spur", "category": "workflow", "name": "The Competitor Trail", "teaser": "A daily workflow that collects new competitor posts from RSS feeds and turns them into a prioritized trend report for the content team.", "domaene": "Recherche & Wissensmanagement", "itemIcon": "swords" } ] }